A randomized phase 3 trial of the immunogenicity and safety of coadministration of a live-attenuated tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) and an inactivated hepatitis a (HAV) virus vaccine in a dengue non-endemic country.

BACKGROUND: Vaccination against hepatitis A virus (HAV) is largely recommended for travelers worldwide. Concurrent dengue and HAV vaccination may be desired in parallel for travelers to countries where both diseases are endemic. This randomized, observer-blind, phase 3 trial evaluated coadministration of HAV vaccine with tetravalent dengue vaccine (TAK-003) in healthy adults aged 18-60 years living in the UK. METHODS: Participants were randomized (1:1:1) to receive HAV vaccine and placebo on Day 1, and placebo on Day 90 (Group 1), TAK-003 and placebo on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 2), or TAK-003 and HAV vaccine on Day 1, and TAK-003 on Day 90 (Group 3). The primary objective was non-inferiority of HAV seroprotection rate (anti-HAV ≥ 12.5 mIU/mL) in Group 3 versus Group 1, one month post-first vaccination (Day 30) in HAV-naïve and dengue-naïve participants. Sensitivity analyses were performed on combinations of baseline HAV and dengue serostatus. Secondary objectives included dengue seropositivity one month post-second vaccination (Day 120), HAV geometric mean concentrations (GMCs), and safety. RESULTS: 900 participants were randomized. On Day 30, HAV seroprotection rates were non-inferior following coadministration of HAV and TAK-003 (Group 3: 98.7 %) to HAV administration alone (Group 1: 97.1 %; difference: -1.68, 95 % CI: -8.91 to 4.28). Sensitivity analyses including participants who were neither HAV-naïve nor DENV-naïve at baseline supported this finding. Anti-HAV GMCs on Day 30 were 82.1 (95 % CI: 62.9-107.1) mIU/mL in Group 1 and 93.0 (76.1-113.6) mIU/mL in Group 3. By Day 120, 90.9-96.8 % of TAK-003 recipients were seropositive (neutralizing antibody titer > 10) to all four dengue serotypes. Coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 was well tolerated, with no important safety risks identified. CONCLUSION: Immune responses following coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 were non-inferior to administration of HAV vaccine alone. The results support the coadministration of HAV vaccine and TAK-003 with no adverse impact on immunogenicity, safety, and reactogenicity of either vaccine. CLINICALTRIALS: gov registration: NCT03525119.

Comparative immunogenicity of an mRNA/LNP and a DNA vaccine targeting HIV gag conserved elements in macaques.

Immunogenicity of HIV-1 mRNA vaccine regimens was analyzed in a non-human primate animal model. Rhesus macaques immunized with mRNA in lipid nanoparticle (mRNA/LNP) formulation expressing HIV-1 Gag and Gag conserved regions (CE) as immunogens developed robust, durable antibody responses but low adaptive T-cell responses. Augmentation of the dose resulted in modest increases in vaccine-induced cellular immunity, with no difference in humoral responses. The gag mRNA/lipid nanoparticle (LNP) vaccine provided suboptimal priming of T cell responses for a heterologous DNA booster vaccination regimen. In contrast, a single immunization with gag mRNA/LNP efficiently boosted both humoral and cellular responses in macaques previously primed by a gag DNA-based vaccine. These anamnestic cellular responses were mediated by activated CD8+ T cells with a phenotype of differentiated T-bet+ cytotoxic memory T lymphocytes. The heterologous prime/boost regimens combining DNA and mRNA/LNP vaccine modalities maximized vaccine-induced cellular and humoral immune responses. Analysis of cytokine responses revealed a transient systemic signature characterized by the release of type I interferon, IL-15 and IFN-related chemokines. The pro-inflammatory status induced by the mRNA/LNP vaccine was also characterized by IL-23 and IL-6, concomitant with the release of IL-17 family of cytokines. Overall, the strong boost of cellular and humoral immunity induced by the mRNA/LNP vaccine suggests that it could be useful as a prophylactic vaccine in heterologous prime/boost modality and in immune therapeutic interventions against HIV infection or other chronic human diseases.

Proof-of-concept of a low-dose unmodified mRNA-based rabies vaccine formulated with lipid nanoparticles in human volunteers: A phase 1 trial.

INTRODUCTION: In a first-in-human study immune responses to rabies virus glycoprotein (RABV-G)-mRNA vaccine were dependent on the route of administration, necessitating specialized devices. Following successful preclinical studies with mRNA encapsulated in lipid nanoparticles (LNP), we tested an mRNA-LNP formulation (CV7202). METHODS: In this phase 1, multi-center, controlled study in Belgium and Germany we enrolled 55 healthy 18-40-year-olds to receive intramuscular injections of 5 µg (n = 10), 1 µg (n = 16), or 2 µg (n = 16) CV7202 on Day 1; subsets (n = 8) of 1 µg and 2 µg groups received second doses on Day 29. Controls (n = 10) received rabies vaccine, Rabipur, on Days 1, 8 and 29. Safety and reactogenicity were assessed up to 28 days post-vaccination using diary cards; immunogenicity was measured as RABV-G-specific neutralizing titers (VNT) by RFFIT and IgG by ELISA. RESULTS: As initially tested doses of 5 µg CV7202 elicited unacceptably high reactogenicity we subsequently tested 1 and 2 µg doses which were better tolerated. No vaccine-related serious adverse events or withdrawals occurred. Low, dose-dependent VNT responses were detectable from Day 15 and by Day 29%, 31% and 22% of 1, 2 and 5 µg groups, respectively, had VNTs ≥ 0·5 IU/mL, considered an adequate response by the WHO. After two 1 or 2 µg doses all recipients had titers ≥ 0.5 IU/mL by Day 43. Day 57 GMTs were not significantly lower than those with Rabipur, which elicited adequate responses in all vaccinees after two doses. CV7202-elicited VNT were significantly correlated with RABV-G-specific IgG antibodies (r2 = 0.8319, p < 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Two 1 µg or 2 µg doses of CV7202 were well tolerated and elicited rabies neutralizing antibody responses that met WHO criteria in all recipients, but 5 µg had unacceptable reactogenicity for a prophylactic vaccine. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03713086.